★ Instant-download test banks & study guides — any 2 for $19.95, any 5 for $39. Discount applies automatically. →

Practice Testing for Nursing School: Why It Beats Rereading

Practice testing means pulling information out of memory, by answering questions or writing a topic out on a blank page, instead of reading it again. A major 2013 review rated it one of only two “high utility” techniques out of ten, and in controlled experiments students who tested themselves remembered more a week later than students who reread. It also rehearses what nursing exams ask you to do.

Key takeaways

  • Dunlosky and colleagues (2013) rated 10 common study techniques and gave only two a high utility rating: practice testing and distributed practice. Rereading and highlighting were rated low.
  • In Roediger and Karpicke (2006), students who took a recall test remembered 56% of a passage one week later, versus 42% for students who restudied it.
  • Rereading wins in the short run: on a test five minutes later, restudying beat testing (81% vs 75%).
  • Keep quizzing what you already know. Word pairs kept in testing were recalled at about 80% a week later; pairs dropped after one correct answer, at about a third.
  • The routine here: three self-quiz passes per chapter (after reading, about 48 hours later, and in the days before the exam) plus a three-column error log.

What Practice Testing Is (and Isn’t)

Practice testing is any low-stakes quiz you give yourself where you produce or choose an answer from memory, then check it. Rereading, highlighting, or looking over a question with the answer already showing is not practice testing, because nothing is being retrieved.

Practice testing vs rereading and highlighting

Rereading feels productive because the material looks familiar the second time. Familiar is not the same as retrievable, and an exam asks you to produce the knowledge with the book closed. The 2013 review by Dunlosky and colleagues found that most students report rereading and highlighting, yet neither consistently improves performance, and it recommended practice testing in place of rereading.

You still read the chapter once to learn it. After that, most review time should go into quizzing, with the book used to check answers. Our guide on how to study in nursing school shows where this fits in a weekly plan.

Retrieval practice, active recall and the testing effect

The testing effect is the research finding: taking a test on material improves how well you remember it later. Retrieval practice is the activity that produces it, and active recall is the name students use for the same study method. Retrieval practice examples for nursing courses:

  • Blank-page recall: close the book, write everything you remember under one heading, then check.
  • Covered drug table: hide every column except the drug name, then write the class, action, a key adverse effect and one nursing consideration.
  • Teach-back: explain a pathophysiology sequence out loud, without notes.

Multiple-choice and recall formats both help, but in a summary written for teachers, Dunlosky explains that students benefit most from tests that require recalling an answer, not just recognizing it. That is why the routine below has you cover the options on some items and answer first.

What the Research Says About Practice Testing

The research is consistent: testing yourself produces better long-term retention than spending the same time rereading, even though rereading often looks better on a test taken minutes later.

Dunlosky et al. utility ratings

Dunlosky and four colleagues rated 10 techniques by whether their benefits held across learners of different ages and abilities, different materials, different kinds of tests and real classrooms. Only practice testing and distributed practice (spreading study sessions out over time) earned a high rating.

Utility ratings for 10 study techniques, Dunlosky et al. (2013) Horizontal bars show the overall rating each technique received. High: practice testing and distributed practice. Moderate: elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaved practice. Low: summarization, highlighting or underlining, keyword mnemonic, imagery for text, and rereading. Bar length shows the rating level only, not an effect size. Utility rating by technique Dunlosky et al. (2013), 10 techniques Practice testing High Distributed practice High Elaborative interrogation Moderate Self-explanation Moderate Interleaved practice Moderate Summarization Low Highlighting / underlining Low Keyword mnemonic Low Imagery for text Low Rereading Low Bar length = rating level, not effect size
Overall utility ratings from Dunlosky et al. (2013). The bars show the category each technique received (high, moderate or low), not a measured effect size. Practice testing is highlighted.

Moderate does not mean ineffective: the authors called the evidence for elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaving promising but limited. The low-rated techniques had narrower or less consistent benefits, and rereading and highlighting did not consistently improve performance.

The testing-effect experiments in brief

Key testing-effect studies and their delayed results
Study Who and what Compared Delayed result
Roediger & Karpicke 2006, Exp. 1 120 undergraduates, short science passages One recall test vs one restudy 1 week: 56% vs 42%
Roediger & Karpicke 2006, Exp. 2 180 undergraduates, same passages Study once + three tests vs study four times 1 week: 61% vs 40%
Karpicke & Roediger 2008 College students, 40 Swahili-English word pairs Keep testing learned pairs vs drop them from testing 1 week: about 80% vs 33 to 36%
Larsen, Butler & Roediger 2009 40 pediatric and emergency medicine residents, two neurology topics Repeated tests with feedback vs repeated review-sheet study About 6 months: 39% vs 26%

In the 2006 study, students who read the passage four times predicted they would remember it best, and remembered it worst a week later. In 2008, students in every condition predicted they would recall about half the pairs, so their predictions missed the real differences entirely.

Keep the size of these results in proportion. Short passages about the sun and sea otters are easier to measure than a med-surg final. A 2018 meta-analysis by Pan and Rickard asked whether testing helps on new, different questions and found a more modest average benefit (d = 0.40). After correcting for possible publication bias, it often found no transfer unless certain conditions, covered below, were present.

Why Practice Testing Works So Well for Nursing Content

Practice testing suits nursing because exams ask you to use knowledge about a client, not recognize a sentence from the textbook. Retrieval is exactly the act of pulling knowledge up so you can use it.

Application-level questions

A nursing exam item rarely asks you to define a loop diuretic. It describes a client taking one, adds a symptom or lab result, and asks what the nurse should check or do first. You have to recall the drug’s action, connect it to the finding and choose an action, from memory. Rereading never makes you build that connection; a practice question does. As Dunlosky notes, a missed answer also tells you what needs restudying.

Transfer to clinical judgment

Pan and Rickard found that transfer to new questions was greatest in a few areas, including application and inference questions and problems involving medical diagnoses. It was more likely when:

  • the correct answers on practice questions were the same as, or similar to, those on the later test;
  • retrieval was elaborated, meaning learners did more than produce a brief answer or got feedback beyond the correct answer;
  • learners got a fair share right during practice.

Those findings translate into three retrieval practice strategies: quiz on your own course content, explain why the right answer is right, and read before the first quiz. Next Generation NCLEX case studies test clinical judgment across a whole client scenario; see our guide to NGN question types.

A 3-Pass Chapter Self-Quiz Routine

Quiz each chapter three times: on the day you finish reading it, about 48 hours later, and in the last few days before the exam. The exact gaps are a practical choice, not a number fixed by research; what the evidence supports is spacing the passes out and retrieving instead of rereading.

Illustrative 3-pass schedule for one chapter (adjust gaps to your exam date)
Pass When What you do
1 Day you finish the chapter Blank-page recall, then chapter questions; start the error log
2 About 48 hours later Error-log rules from memory, then fresh questions
3 2 to 4 days before the exam Mixed, timed questions from every exam chapter

Pass 1 after reading

  1. Close the book and spend five minutes writing what you remember under each main heading. Check it.
  2. Answer a set of chapter questions without looking anything up, marking each answer “sure” or “guess”.
  3. Read every rationale. Log each miss and each lucky guess in your error log.

Pass 2 at 48 hours

Start with the error log: cover the rule column and state each rule from memory. Then answer fresh questions, or redo missed ones with the options covered. This follows Dunlosky’s advice to keep self-testing with feedback until you recall each idea correctly once, then get it right again on another day. Items you got right on pass 1 still belong here.

Pass 3 before the exam

Two to four days out, mix questions from every exam chapter and time yourself. Mixing makes you work out which concept each question tests, something a single-chapter block gives away; Dunlosky’s team rated this kind of interleaving moderate utility. Finish with a run through your rule column. Leaving pass 3 for the night before leaves no time to fix what it uncovers.

Practice it with your textbook’s questions

The routine needs a steady supply of chapter questions with rationales. If your course uses one of these textbooks, an edition-matched test bank covers all three passes.

Each test bank is matched to one edition and ISBN-13. Check the number on your book before you buy.

How to Review Rationales So Mistakes Stick

Review every rationale, including those for lucky guesses, and turn each miss into a one-line rule you can quiz yourself on. In Butler and Roediger (2008), feedback after a multiple-choice test, immediate or delayed, increased correct answers on a later test and reduced the wrong options students carried forward. Without feedback, a wrong option you picked can stick as something you “know”. Our guide on how to use a nursing test bank covers the full review workflow.

The error log: wrong, why, rule

An error log records every miss in three columns: what you chose, why, and the rule that would have gotten it right. Keep one per course so passes 2 and 3 start from it.

Error log template with sample entries
Wrong Why Rule
Picked a correct statement on a “needs further teaching” item Missed the negative stem “Needs further teaching” means find the incorrect statement
Mixed up two drugs from one class Learned them on the same card Write the one feature that tells them apart, and quiz it
Chose a helpful action that wasn’t the first action Answered “what helps” instead of “what comes first” Rank by immediate threat to the client, using your course’s priority framework

The why column shows patterns: if most misses are reading errors, more content review won’t fix them. For clinical rules, use your program’s textbook wording and your instructor’s guidance.

Turning errors into flashcards

Each rule becomes the back of a flashcard; the front is a short cue in your own words. Write your answer before you flip. Keep the card in the deck until you get it right, then see it once more on another day before retiring it.

Common Practice-Testing Mistakes

The three common mistakes are recognizing questions instead of retrieving answers, quizzing only comfortable material, and skipping review.

Memorizing answer letters

After seeing a question twice, you may remember the answer was “C” without knowing why. That is recognition, not retrieval. Cover the options and answer first, or change one detail in the stem and ask what the new answer would be.

Quizzing only on easy chapters

The chapters you avoid are the ones your error log needs most, so spread passes across every exam chapter. Don’t drop topics after one correct answer either: in the 2008 study, items left out of later testing were forgotten far faster.

Skipping review

Answering 50 questions and checking only the score wastes most of the session. The score tells you how you did; the rationales tell you what to change.

Where to Get Good Practice Questions

Use three sources: end-of-chapter questions, an edition-matched test bank for volume and rationales, and questions you write yourself.

End-of-chapter questions

These are free and match your textbook exactly, but a chapter often has only a handful, sometimes with answers printed nearby. Treat them as the start of pass 1, not the whole pass.

Edition-matched test banks

A test bank is a set of chapter-by-chapter practice questions with rationales, matched to one textbook edition and ISBN. It is a self-assessment study aid, not your instructor’s exam, and it can’t promise a grade. Use it for self-quizzing within your school’s academic-integrity policy; our explainer on what a test bank is covers the details. You can browse nursing test banks by course, including medical-surgical test banks and pharmacology test banks.

Writing your own

Turn each chapter heading into a question, and write at least one that describes a client rather than asking for a definition. Add a two-sentence rationale; explaining an answer is close to what researchers call elaborated retrieval.

Frequently asked questions

Is practice testing better than rereading?

For remembering material days or weeks later, yes. In Roediger and Karpicke’s 2006 experiments, tested students recalled 56% of a passage after one week versus 42% for restudiers, and 61% versus 40% when testing was repeated. Rereading came out ahead only on a test given five minutes later.

What is the difference between active recall and retrieval practice?

There is no practical difference. Retrieval practice is the researchers’ term for pulling information out of memory; active recall is the popular name for the same activity. The testing effect is the result: material you retrieve is usually remembered better later than material you only reread.

How many practice questions should I do per chapter?

No study sets a fixed number. A workable rule is enough questions to touch every main heading, then keep going until each missed item has been answered correctly from memory at least once. Dunlosky’s practical advice adds one step: get it right again on a later day.

Should I practice test before I feel ready?

Yes, once you have read the material. Feeling ready is a poor guide: in Roediger and Karpicke’s study, students who reread the most predicted the best recall and had the worst. Read first, though, because getting a fair share right during practice made transfer more likely.

Does practice testing help with NCLEX-style questions?

Probably, though no study we reviewed measured NCLEX results directly. Pan and Rickard found some of the strongest transfer to application and inference questions and to problems involving medical diagnoses, and residents who were tested retained more six months later. Practice testing builds retrieval and application skill; it can’t guarantee a score.

Bottom line: start with one chapter this week

Pick the chapter your next exam leans on most. Do pass 1 on the day you finish reading it, start an error log with three columns (wrong, why, rule), and put pass 2 in your calendar for two days later. Once that loop feels normal, run it for every chapter on the exam.

Sources & further reading